• To: ext Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
• From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@n...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:56:43 +0200
• In-reply-to: <69B15B675E99D411A4110008C786DA2301C698C8@e...>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

On 2002-02-13 14:29, "ext Miles Sabin" <MSabin@i...> wrote:

> ... that's why we've traditionally, if controversially, made a
> sharp distinction between Universal Resource *Locators* and Universal
> Resource *Names*.

Careful, or the 'modern' folks will label you as passe and
woefully behind the times for preaching the classicial view
heresy (even though it really is the true gospel ;-)

Patrick


--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@n...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
    • From: Kal Ahmed <kal@t...>

• References:
  • Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
    • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: "Abstract"URIs
• Next by Date: Re: RE: WSIO vs. Semantic Web
• Previous by thread: Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
• Next by thread: Re: Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread