• To: francis@r..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: living fossil?
• From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:05:34 -0800
• Bcc:

I think .NET Beta 2 is a fossil.
Haven't they already gone to General Release ?

I would be horrified and surprised if this still persists in MS's current 
code.

-Wayne Steele


>From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
>Reply-To: francis@r...
>To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
>Subject:  living fossil?
>Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 12:56:18 +0000
>
>Hi,
>
>I found this in a .NET public beta 2 CAB file that I just generated:
>
>--
><?XML version="1.0" ENCODING='UTF-8'?>
><!DOCTYPE SOFTPKG SYSTEM "http://www.microsoft.com/standards/osd/osd.dtd">
><?XML::namespace href="http://www.microsoft.com/standards/osd/msicd.dtd"
>as="MSICD"?>
><SOFTPKG NAME="BufferMapperCab" VERSION="1,0,0,0">
>         <TITLE> BufferMapperCab </TITLE>
>             <MSICD::NATIVECODE>
>                 <CODE NAME="BufferMapper">
>                     <IMPLEMENTATION>
>                         <CODEBASE FILENAME="BufferMapper.exe">
>                         </CODEBASE>
>                     </IMPLEMENTATION>
>                 </CODE>
>             </MSICD::NATIVECODE>
></SOFTPKG>
>--
>
>Anyone recognise this PI-based usage - is it a pre-namespaces-rec
>syntax, or what?
>
>Francis.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schemas for X12 documents
• Next by Date: RE: A heavier-weight proposal for character entity definition
• Previous by thread: [xmlstds] Release Announcement
• Next by thread: RE: FW: living fossil?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread