• To: "David G. Durand" <david@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPointer crisis
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:29:35 -0500
• In-reply-to: <p05100303b8807575e600@[192.168.155.106]>

At 11:59 AM 2/1/2002 -0500, David G. Durand wrote:
>If you read the archives, you may also be puzzled that the word within the 
>W3c seems to be that XPointer is dead, given the very small number of 
>negative comments submitted. [There's no denying that the one I found in 
>quick scan of the archives for the last 4 months was very negative]. 
>However, such issues are irrelevant at this point.

I just looked at the archives, and the very small number of comments of 
*any* kind is striking.

Jonathan

• References:
  • XPointer crisis
    • From: "David G. Durand" <david@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer crisis
• Next by Date: RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer crisis
• Next by thread: RE: XPointer crisis
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread