• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:18:57 -0500
• In-reply-to: <042801c185b1$adc8ad00$6800000a@b...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200112141520.PAA02221@m...> <E16F4Xc-00007f-00@s...> <042801c185b1$adc8ad00$6800000a@b...>

On Saturday 15 December 2001 04:36 pm, David Brownell wrote:
> > > It'd be much better to have that normalization be done by layers
> > > above XML than to hard-wire such requirements into the core
> > > of XML.  I'd certainly expect normalization rules to evolve.
> >
> > Actually, it might be better to do it below the parser... closer to the
> > input stream level.
>
> That'd mean "inside the parser", because of autodetection
> of charsets.  Unless there's a standard non-text I/O layer
> that XML parsers must start to use ... :)

I actually meant closer to the Reader level in java.io (or nio Channel).  
Normalization needs to happen a low down as possible otherwise the 
differences between normalized and non-normalized text will poke their noses 
in places they shouldn't.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
• Next by thread: Re: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread