Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Soumitra My 5 cents is wait for the Update. If the XQuery goes to rec. without update, everybody will invent their own update, and a mes will prevail. JJ > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Soumitra Sengupta [mailto:soumitra@b...] > Sendt: 23. december 2001 17:48 > Til: Champion, Mike > Cc: xml-dev@l... > Emne: Re: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working > drafts - Stil l > missing Updates > > > I remember seeing a comment by Michael Rys in this group. He said > something like - the group ran out of bandwidth to deal with the > UPDATE.semantics at this time and will visit it later. My > question is > this - Is it better to let the XQuery get to recommendation without > UPDATE now and then deal with it later? or Is it better to delay this > and have a more complete XQuery recommendation a few months later? > I do not know the answer to this yet but would like to hear other > opinions. As Mike points out, if there are enough people on > the side of > deciding on UPDATE now, there maybe time to deal with this. > > Soumitra > > Champion, Mike wrote: > > > > > > >Anyway, I [personally, the corporate line may be different] > agree that > >XQuery badly needs update support sooner rather than later. I can't > >imagine that people feel as strongly about this issue as > they do about > >patents, but look what happened when the rest of the world > told the W3C that > >the patent policy working group was going down an unacceptable path > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> > >
|
