• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:32:02 -0600

It's not just you.  It is implicit in the 
notion of namespaces, first, and in the 
idea that if they identify anything, they 
might identify something architectural.

You might want to ask yourself personally 
why the concept reemerges frequently.  If a 
control emerges, it is usually in response to some 
form of ontological entanglement that is 
naturally occurring.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

At 05:55 PM 07/12/01 +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
><xs:element name="isbn" type="pub:isbn"/>
>my instance document is:
><book>
>  <isbn>....</isbn>
>...
></book>
>and determining that the content of <isbn> is a isbn number as defined by
the namespace prefixed as "pub" requires to process the schema.

Is it just me, or is there an odor of architectural forms 
in the room? -Tim

• Prev by Date: RE: Attribute Order
• Next by Date: Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Previous by thread: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• Next by thread: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread