• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:35:17 -0500
• In-reply-to: <021401c1885b$2ec26da0$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251914@R...> <021401c1885b$2ec26da0$4bc8a8c0@A...>

On Wednesday 19 December 2001 02:02 am, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> And that lies at the heart of the matter: if we allow control characters
> and silly name characters, we won't actually increase the number of
> characters that can be reliable sent: we will just make non-ASCII
> characters suspect and unreliable.

Precisely my earlier point. With this, XML makes it easy to blurr the 
byte/character distinction, and would then be suspect as a text markup 
language.

Welcome to HTML 2.0 all over again.

• References:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
  • Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: terra incognita
• Next by Date: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Previous by thread: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by thread: RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread