• To: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>,"Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Attribute Order
• From: "Sai N" <sai@e...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:34:07 -0500
• References: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E40200AC0C@u...> <0fe501c17f65$4846aba0$6800000a@b...>

*grin* - it could also be job insurance :-)
In this bad job market - would you blame him? 
*tongue firmly in cheek*

Sai
> 
> The developer in question might be trying to wedge
> vendor-specific requirements into an architecture.
> If not the intent, that's the result.  Bad idea IMO.
> 
> - Dave

• References:
  • RE: Attribute Order
    • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
  • Re: Attribute Order
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Attribute Order
• Next by Date: Re: Attribute Order
• Previous by thread: Re: Attribute Order
• Next by thread: Re: Attribute Order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread