• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@c...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:31:57 +0000
• Cc: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@S...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <004901c18948$c43283a0$465169d5@pcukmka>
• Sender: kari@c...

Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> > > It would be nice if someone who actually used XML on
> > mainframes (I've
> > > heard rumors that they are out there) would chime in here.
> >
> > Going by the number of replies, I'm guessing that the problem of
> > accommodating NELs in documents is very pressing to the XML community.
> > Or that the people from whom this problem is pressing are very shy.
> 
> They're not shy, they're locked up behind corporate firewalls, able to
> browse our archives but forbidden by corporate regulations from contributing
> to the discussion unless they get permission from their Director of Public
> Relations.

I have nothing but sympathy for the developer (or vendor) who wants to
influence core XML but doesn't post on xml-dev.

Ari.

• References:
  • RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Next by Date: Re: Goodbye to textual applications?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Next by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread