• To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@y...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@c...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 05:37:44 +0000
• References: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251A0B@R...> <013901c18912$581fcbe0$4bc8a8c0@A...> <001801c1892e$36bd96a0$0500a8c0@carnage>
• Sender: kari@c...

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> 
> 1.) Exactly how common is piping XML (not ASCII) used in UNIX applications? I
> have never seen a UNIX app that does this.

More common than you might think. If you'd heard my talk at XML2001
you'd have heard how we pipe a schema validator's output into XSLT
processors to analyze the PSVI and if you heard Henry Thompson's talk,
you'd have heard about what he calls 'fat pipes' for XML processing.

Ari.

• References:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
  • Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Next by Date: RE: Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft)
• Previous by thread: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Next by thread: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread