• To: "Clark C . Evans" <cce@c...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: URI for class names and native data types
• From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 15:47:41 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <20011218095126.A12607@d...>

> From: Clark C . Evans [mailto:cce@c...]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:51 PM
> To: xml-dev
> Subject: Re:  URI for class names and native data types
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:15:43PM -0000, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> | For Java purposes, why not use the javadoc URI?
> | e.g. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/lang/Integer.html
> 
> Thanks Leigh,
> 
> That is a good idea, but I'd prefer a mechanism that
> works across multiple languages.  After reading the
> RFC a bit more, I was thinking something like this:
> 
>    type://language/the/package/path#classname

That's not a valid URI (it's a URI reference, though).

• References:
  • Re: URI for class names and native data types
    • From: "Clark C . Evans" <cce@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: URI for class names and native data types
• Next by Date: Re: URI for class names and native data types
• Previous by thread: Re: URI for class names and native data types
• Next by thread: Re: URI for class names and native data types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread