• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So mecomments on the 1.1 draft)
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 21:39:36 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Mike.Champion@S..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200112152156.VAA31918@p...> from David Carlisle at"Dec 15, 2001 09:56:30 pm"

David Carlisle scripsit:

> It is unnatural to
> allow #85 as white space in XML as (currently at least) it isn't as far
> as I know an end of line character in any ascii/unicode based system.

It is.  ASCII text files on a mainframe use #x85 (encoded as 85)
as the line-end character.

> At least NEL was flagged as being considered in the original
> requirements doc and is a single byte in utf8.

Two bytes in UTF-8; one byte in 8859-x.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and mainframes,yet again (was RE: So me comments on the 1.1 draft)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft)
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: Somecomments on the 1.1 draft)
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: So
• Next by thread: Re: XML and mainframes,yet again (was RE: So me comments on the 1.1 draft)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread