• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:18:49 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251A0B@R...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251A0B@R...>

On Wednesday 19 December 2001 09:53 pm, Michael Rys wrote:
> They would all mean nothing in the context of the markup (ie they are
> exposed as a character information item with their Unicode code point)
> and display is left to the output device.

Rick's point is that these are not text. The fact that they are characters in 
Unicode is more an accident of history than anything else, I think. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Xpath/XSLT specific lists?
    • From: Jim Akiba <jim@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML)
• Next by Date: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Next by thread: Xpath/XSLT specific lists?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread