• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• From: Krakow Patrice <Patrice.Krakow@S...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:23:11 +0100
• Cc: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@i...>

Hello,

Yes, imagine something like

<length length-uom="mm">200</length>

Did you reply that you prefer

<length uom="...">
<weight uom="...">

?

If yes, it means that you do not care to a "length" measured in "kg"?

/Patrice

-----Original Message-----
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:17 PM
To: Krakow Patrice; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Validating schema vs. non validating schema


<length uom="...">
<weight uom="...">

assuming the actual length or weight value is 
elsewhere (text node, atttribute value, etc.)

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Krakow Patrice [mailto:Patrice.Krakow@S...]

What do you prefer?

<length length-uom="...">
<weight weight-uom="...">
where length-uom=m|mm and weight-uom=kg|g

• Prev by Date: RE: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• Next by Date: RE: validating against the standard W3C
• Previous by thread: RE: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• Next by thread: RE: Validating schema vs. non validating schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread