• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attributeorder)
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:51:55 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p04330100b83a7452045b@[192.168.254.4]> from Elliotte Rusty Haroldat "Dec 10, 2001 10:20:10 am"

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> I'd argue that any spec that imposes additional constraints on 
> processors not imposed by XML 1.0 is not compliant with XML. 

Won't work.

XML 1.0 does not require that processors report element types/GIs.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Attribute Order
• Next by Date: RE: Attribute Order
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread