• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
• From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:50:57 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:49 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  XML and mainframes, yet again
> 
> 
> I just had an idea.  How about defining a new Unicode encoding,
> named IBM-with-NEL or something like that, in which the byte
> value #x85 was considered to be an encoding of the character
> U+000A, LINE FEED.  

I've been wondering about similar things... I presume that there is an
EBCDIC encoding already that mainframe XML folks use; what does it do with
NEL?  It would be nice if someone who actually used XML on mainframes (I've
heard rumors that they are out there) would chime in here.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
    • From: "K. Ari Krupnikov" <ari@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Nasty XPath expressions
• Next by Date: RE: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Previous by thread: ANN: New book on XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread