• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
• From: Harriet Whitlock <whitlohs@U...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:49:21 -0500 (EST)
• In-reply-to: <471E425A0BB6D211972C00105AC954240217CE82@S...>

Actually, oddly,  I WAS unsubscribed and was planning to resubscribe
(just now back from vacation). I'm guessing that the list was recovered
from a backup or somesuch?


 On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 John.Brooking@N... wrote:

> Actually, I didn't want to reply just to say "me, too", but:
>  
>    Me too!
>  
<snip> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AndrewWatt2000@a... [mailto:AndrewWatt2000@a...]
 <snip>
> Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: 
> 
> > This is the first xml-dev message I've gotten in almost a week, so I guess
> > back up. 
<snip> 
> But it's still SUSPICIOUSLY quiet. Not one tiny bit like XML-DEV. :) 
 <snip>

• References:
  • RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
    • From: John.Brooking@N...

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
• Next by Date: RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread