• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: NULL in C (was RE: Why would MS want to makeXML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?)
• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:37:27 -0800
• References: <200112220007.AAA28326@r...>

> >This is going off-topic a bit, but two ways to represent
> > 0C in C strings are:
> 
> Yes, there are certainly reasonable ways to do it.

Only if one is willing to give up the standardized
convention for representing strings in C ... have
a look at "strcpy", "strlen", "snprintf", and so on.

Of course, if you wanted to shift development
away from an open standard platform such as
C+POSIX, and had thought you'd already gotten
past the POSIX issue with a closed OS API ... ;)

- Dave

• References:
  • Re: NULL in C (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?)
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: uncle! XHTML Basic and validation
• Next by Date: RE: Announcement: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts
• Previous by thread: Re: NULL in C (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?)
• Next by thread: Bounds Specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread