• To: mrys@m...
• Subject: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:03:18 +0900 (JST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251952@R...>
• References: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A251952@R...>

From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>
Subject: RE:  Some comments on the 1.1 draft
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:14:59 -0800

> The normalization of CR, LF and CRLF can be avoided by using their
> character entities. So I still can preserve fidelity.

You are right.

How do you feel about allowing character references to C0
control functions rather than using them directly?  I was once 
told that such changes are harmful, since bidirectional conversion 
between characters and character references is useful for I18N.  
However, since #&xD; cannot be safely converted to carriage-return,
such bidirectional conversion is already impossible.

Cheers,

Makoto

• References:
  • RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
    • From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: terra incognita
• Next by Date: Re: XML and mainframes, yet again
• Previous by thread: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Next by thread: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread