• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it)
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 23:26:16 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <74.14e0fcd0.294bb291@a...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>In the absence of namespace support let's recognise "XML 1.1" for what it is 
>- XML 1.0, 3rd Edition. And name it accordingly.

You can call it what you like, but since it has different rules for
what is well-formed, you had better have some way of telling the
parser which version it is.  Such as a different value for version
in the XML declaration.

The errata to XML that were incorporated in the second edition were
just that: errata.  They were mistakes in the spec which needed to be
corrected.  That's not the case with 1.1.

-- Richard

• References:
  • XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it)
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: Nasty XPath expressions
• Next by Date: RE: Nasty XPath expressions
• Previous by thread: XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it)
• Next by thread: RE: XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread