• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:10:48 -0600

The disturbing thing is how quickly that limited set will 
get you a perfectly computable and comfortably ignorable 
standard.

Without users, code is poetry, not product and standards 
are textbooks, not specifications.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]

Of course, what the community is or should be is another
matter. I guess I have been using it as a code word for
the inventors, maintainers and implementors, rather than
users.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Next by Date: Re: Attribute Order
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: validating hairy data models (was Attribute order)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread