• To: Mike.Champion@S..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• From: "Peter J. Gale" <thesemanticweb@y...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:23:56 +0000 (GMT)
• In-reply-to: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E40200AA6E@u...>

Mike,

 --- "Champion, Mike"
<Mike.Champion@S...> wrote: > 

> Rather than saving effort by keeping SGML warts and
> all, better to learn the
> lessons of SGML's life and find the powerful and
> stable ideas at the core of
> SGML and XML, and bet on those newer ideas that are
> simple enough to
> understand and implement in a modular, re-usable
> manner.  

Am I misreading you here, or are you saying that
perhaps XML is not up to the job required of it? Or is
it just SGML that should go?

Peter







________________________________________________________________
Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. 
Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! 
The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.

• References:
  • RE: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@S...>

• Prev by Date: importing and accessing data
• Next by Date: Re: Where have the element types gone?
• Previous by thread: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• Next by thread: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread