• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:10:44 -0500
• In-reply-to: <033901c189fa$e8775ad0$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200112210118.BAA07722@r...> <033901c189fa$e8775ad0$4bc8a8c0@A...>

On Friday 21 December 2001 03:38 am, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>But I have been confused with talking of pipes and stdio when the APIs I 
>mentioned all deal with file IO.  The mechanics I gave were wrong, however 
>the problem is still real. 

On some Unices, "more" will fail to open the file, let alone display it 
correctly.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Supporting Unicode
• Next by Date: Re: Goodbye to textual applications?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Next by thread: Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread