• To: "'Jonathan Borden'" <jborden@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: uncle! XHTML Basic and validation
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:33:45 -0800

> From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]

<snip/>
 
> How should this be resolved:
> 
> 1) don't use XHTML Basic (or any XHTML modularization)
> 2) require all documents to be prefixed even those that don't 
> have XHTML
> content.
> 3) require all content to have explicit xmnls="...xhtml..." 
> declarations.
> 4) give up and move to XML schemas

I'd go for choice 4, though I'd use the term "XML schemas" rather broadly to
include any namespace-aware schema language, not just W3C XML Schema.

DTDs and namespaces just don't mix well.

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates
• Next by Date: RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates
• Next by thread: RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread