• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:37:27 +0000
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306C3682C@HQ5>

Arch forms are like brightly coloured fish, swimming towards
a deep pool of power tools, metabolising footnote references
from a sea tainted with toner carbon and essence of passion
fruit.

Sean
(Jetlagged)

At 13:59 10/12/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Perhaps arch forms are really the actuarial tables
>of markup common practice.
>
>len
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
>
>Is it just me, or is there an odor of architectural forms
>in the room? -Tim
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

http://www.propylon.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • DTD problem
    • From: "Paul Johnston" <pjohnston@p...>

• References:
  • RE: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: 5-byte UTF-8 encoding not supported
• Next by Date: DTD problem
• Previous by thread: RE: Where have the element types gone?
• Next by thread: DTD problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread