• To: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@p...>, "Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Should attributes be prefixed
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:16:33 -0800
• References: <3C552E6ED5B7DC4F8BF603C030BB70BF3E284A@H...>

Go with Evan's suggestion, then. Except in the case he mentions, I have
yet to see any advantage to an attribute being "in" a namespace.

-- Ron

Doug Ransom wrote:
> 
> The software will process whatever the document format we design is.  I am
> more concerned with the best practice for scoping attributes.  No namespace
> or namespaced/prefixed.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Should attributes be prefixed
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Should attributes be prefixed
    • From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Validate XML selectively
• Next by Date: Re: tricky validation problem w multiple schemas
• Previous by thread: RE: Should attributes be prefixed
• Next by thread: Re: Should attributes be prefixed
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread