• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Caught napping!
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 13:08:28 -0800
• References: <61E5C6CA53E7D211BD9F0008C7EBB904031E3934@e...>

"Seaborne, Mark" wrote:
> >Ouch!!!!! A fact about XML structures today, is that they promote data
> >redundancy.

> Isn't this the kind of thing that xLink can be used for?

It is. But if you fully normalize your data and then XLink everything
together, you've just built a relational database, so why not just use
one to start with?

(The obvious answer to this question is that you have mixed content,
which doesn't play well with the object-relational mapping used by
XML-enabled relational databases.)

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@e...>

• References:
  • RE: Caught napping!
    • From: "Seaborne, Mark" <Mark_Seaborne@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: Caught napping!
• Previous by thread: RE: Caught napping!
• Next by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread