• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:30:21 -0500

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 08:41:39AM -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> What would result from the reverse solution:  a document which 
> is subject to a raw XPointer must have a DTD or Schema?

  This is already the case.
#foo is equivalent to xpointer(id('foo')) and since there is no DTD,
there is no ID, and hence the expresssion returns an empty location set.
This is a sub-resource error.
  http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr/#dt-sub-rsc-err

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread