• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XML with Java
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:38:35 -0600

For "doctrine can determine design decision options" threads, here is an
article on HailStorm.

http://www.fawcette.com/xmlmag/2001_11/online/online_print/lucovskyinterview
/default.asp

A quote from the end of the article:

"The magic is on the business side and Microsoft is first and foremost a
business and we're about the economics. Technology is a means to achieve
that. And that's the piece that these other guys haven't cracked."

It is followed by a kick to the open source model, but doesn't do it
justice.  Open 
source can work just fine in a business model as long as there are lots of
companies 
willing and able to support development.  There are Tortoise and Hare
issues, but  
given a well-motivated Hare, the story ends differently.   The Tortoise is a

motivator but even then, see Looney Tunes for alternatives. ;-)

len

• Prev by Date: Re: Version 1.4 of XSV released: derivation-by-restriction experiment
• Next by Date: Applications of IDness: Get it from the storage system (Was RE: The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XM L with Java)
• Previous by thread: Re: Version 1.4 of XSV released: derivation-by-restriction experiment
• Next by thread: Applications of IDness: Get it from the storage system (Was RE: The XMLReader Interface, Chapter 7 of Processing XM L with Java)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread