• To: ian.graham@u...
• Subject: Re: Registration status
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:38:44 GMT
• Cc: ietf-xml-mime@i..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0111151839330.630-100000@i...>(message from Ian Graham on Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:49:00 -0500 (EST))
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0111151839330.630-100000@i...>

> Any thoughts?

sounds reasonable to me, although I vaguely remember some previous
discussion as to why having separate xxx+xml types was thought
preferable to having extra information layered over the xml type.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Prev by Date: Re: Comparing 2 xml documents
• Next by Date: RE: Interoperability [long]
• Previous by thread: RE: Registration status
• Next by thread: Re: Registration status
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread