[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> Let me phrase the question this way: regarding validity and validity > only, not the semantics of the attribute, is there any objection to > an xml:id attribute that is not equally true of xml:base? So far I > can't see one. That doesn't mean it's right though. I'm not disagreeing with xml:id so much as the implicit assertion that because something is standardized it solves problems in a way acceptable to the masses. I, for example, find both the stylesheet PI and xml:base to be of little real value...
|

Cart



