• To: ian.graham@u..., igraham@i...
• Subject: Re: Registration status
• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:38:05 +0900 (JST)
• Cc: ned+xml-mime@m..., davidc@n...,ietf-xml-mime@i..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0111181750400.11793-100000@i...>
• References: <01KAUAR4BJ86001D5Q@m...><Pine.SOL.4.21.0111181750400.11793-100000@i...>

From: Ian Graham <igraham@i...>
Subject: Re:  Registration status
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:26:30 -0500 (EST)

> I think (ii) is the $1000 question.  A $500 question might be: "Did the
> authors of RFC 3023 consider the RFC 2912 mechanism for providing internal
> data about XML typed data?" (RFC 2912 isn't mentioned in 3023).

Yes, we were aware of RFC 2912.  We thus did not try to solve 
problems addressed by it.  I am happy to mention it in the next 
RFC for XML media types.

Cheers,

Makoto

• Prev by Date: RE: Should attributes be prefixed
• Next by Date: Validate XML selectively
• Previous by thread: Re: Registration status
• Next by thread: RE: Understanding the ID
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread