• To: Will Johnson <will.johnson@a...>,Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 13:20:29 -0800
• References: <005301c16d43$225affb0$cd09110a@sambo><3BF2D601.3B15989C@r...> <009901c16d4f$afa2a380$2cd0a340@pault><00c801c16d50$26fb76f0$cd09110a@sambo>

> first let me appologize for the broken XML i used in my sample.  and i
> figured out a "workaround"...  if you wrap the node in a CDATA section you
> get all the text including xml tages with no extra effort.

I think that on a long run, CDATA sections may give you
more trouble, than manual encoding of  & <> " '

Isn't that CDATA construction just plain ugly? ;-)

Why don't define two finctions _normattr and _normcontent
and use them every time when you write something
out? Sounds lame, sorry ... Well, if I remember properly,
XT does something like that, so maybe it is not that lame
actually.

Rgds.Paul.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>

• References:
  • use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by Date: Re: Interoperability
• Previous by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread