Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 3:59 PM -0800 11/5/01, Michael Brennan wrote: >Is there any reason why XLink labels cannot be used for this? If you want to >use a simple name in a fragment identifier, why not treat the referenced >element as a resource and give it an xlink:label attribute, and modify >XPointer to permit use of XLink label names as fragment identifiers as an >alternative to IDs? > That sounds like an excellent idea. Off the top of my head, I don't see why it couldn't work. I just looked in the XLink specification and don't see anything there that would prohibit putting labels on almost any element in a document you cared to. It doesn't say you can, but it doesn't say you can't either. It does say you can't put it on certain types of XLink elements which is tricky, but maybe we can fix that. We don't define any new attributes. We just use the xlink:label attribute XLink already defines and add one sentence to the XPointer spec specifying that a bare name XPointer can point to an element with an xlink:label. Sounds good to me. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
