• To: PaulT <pault12@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:25:40 -0800
• References: <005301c16d43$225affb0$cd09110a@sambo><3BF2D601.3B15989C@r...> <009901c16d4f$afa2a380$2cd0a340@pault><0cd801c16d55$a6933ec0$6800000a@b...><011701c16d59$0132ade0$2cd0a340@pault>

> > The response from Ron Bourrett was on the mark except
> > that I'd have said to always use an XMLWriter of some kind.
> 
> > There are too many corner cases you can trip over when you
> > try to turn "raw data" into XML text.
> 
> I think it depends on XML subset one is using.

I said "XML" -- no subset, the Real Thing.  :)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>

• References:
  • use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: "Will Johnson" <will.johnson@a...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
    • From: PaulT <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by Date: RE: Updating XML
• Previous by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Next by thread: Re: use SAX to get "tree" under XML node
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread