Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
James Clark: > However, in this sitation with IE5/6, the fragment identifier > will be interpreted not with respect the XML document, but with respect to > the HTML document generated by the XSLT stylesheet. Now, this is arguably > broken, but it's quite practical. Yes, of course that's one reason that this hasn't really been an issue so far, and isn't critical at the moment. "Native" XML browsing is only just becoming possible now, and currently the browsers don't really do anything with the fragment ID at all in XML mode, at best you'll be able to get hold of it and use it in the internally generated html, but that is (perhaps) just the current state of play, not the ideal situation. Having a useful definition of the fragment identifier in XML would perhaps help improve this situation. (Otherwise for example full XPointer fragment ids are always going to be of little use if the fragment id is always interpreted after transformation and so on non-XML content.) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
