• From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@b...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 16:16:53 +0200

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Park [mailto:donpark@d...] 

> Aye.  One more vote for xml:idatt.  I prefer its value to be 
> a list of zero
> or more XML names.  Nested xml:idatt should override inherited list
> completely.
> 
> One serious problem is the namespace issue which is further 
> complicated when
> dealing with a list of attribute names belonging to multiple 
> namespaces.

I don't see any dificulties in that one. Taking the
cdata-section-elements attribute from the XSLT namespace as an example
(from [1] ):
"The cdata-section-elements attribute contains a whitespace-separated
list of QNames. Each QName is expanded into an expanded-name using the
namespace declarations in effect on the xsl:output element in which the
QName occurs; if there is a default namespace, it is used for QNames
that do not have a prefix."

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-XML-Output-Method

Kindest regards,
Manos

• Prev by Date: RE: Understanding the ID
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread