• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• Subject: Re: Global or shared namespace?
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 07:43:53 +0100
• Cc: Elena Litani <elitani@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <3C0562D7.2276B986@c...> <16b001c17862$ea9bed20$6800000a@b...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011127

Hi David,

David Brownell wrote:


> 
>     - It's a namespace URI that actually points
>       to something -- completely unexpected!!


Unexpected maybe, but not an exception :=) .

The W3C has created pages on most (if not all) the URIs used as 
namespaces. Try for instance:

http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/

http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform


These pages contain a short description and, sometimes, a link to the 
corresponding specification.

Some of them point to RDDL documents, for instance:

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace

Content negociation is performed for these URIs and, depending on how 
your browser is configured, you can also receive other documents such as 
a W3C XML Schema.

This makes my suggestion to give a URI for the "no namespace" stronger 
:) ...

Eric
-- 
See you in Orlando for XML 2001.
                                     http://www.xmlconference.net/xmlusa/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Re: Global or shared namespace?
    • From: Elena Litani <elitani@c...>
  • Re: Global or shared namespace?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Resolving DTD location using a SAX2 EntityResolver
• Next by Date: RE: Acronyms (was RE: XML Buzzwords. RFC)
• Previous by thread: Re: Global or shared namespace?
• Next by thread: Re: Global or shared namespace?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread