• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Namespaces Talk
• From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:17:21 -0000
• Importance: Normal

[apologies to those already on www-talk]

Not everyone has signed the Treaty of Wulai it seems.

The www-talk mailing list is debating what's at the 
end of a namespace. A discussion thats spread 
from the Dublin Core people, who were considering using 
RDDL apparently [1].

There's even mention of an 'xmlns' URI scheme [2]...

Cheers,

L.

[1]. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/2001NovDec/0009.html
[2]. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-talk/2001NovDec/0015.html

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• Follow-Ups:
  • SWISSPROT DTD
    • From: Leela Krishna Poola <krishna@d...>

• Prev by Date: How to avoid the sequens of child elements in DTD, yet keep the cardinality?
• Next by Date: Re: Updating XML
• Previous by thread: Re: How to avoid the sequens of child elements in DTD, yet keep the cardinality?
• Next by thread: SWISSPROT DTD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread