• To: elharo@m...
• Subject: Re: Opera XML hypertexxt
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:23:18 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p04330106b816ccbec30a@[192.168.254.4]> (message from ElliotteRusty Harold on Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:14:37 -0400)
• References: <20011109155307.M12271@r...><5.1.0.14.2.20011109123709.020beec0@p...><5.1.0.14.2.20011109123709.020beec0@p...><5.0.2.1.0.20011113103344.01cc1db8@p...> <p04330106b816ccbec30a@[192.168.254.4]>

> Is this any sort of standard or proposed part of CSS in CSS3? or is 
> it just something Opera invented for their own use?

the latter

http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#css

Although it is (or is planned to be) a w3c note
http://people.opera.com/howcome/2000/clink/2000-11-06.html

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Opera XML hypertexxt
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Opera XML hypertexxt
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: annotations outside validation
• Next by Date: Re: IDs considered harmful or why keys might be betterthanIDs...
• Previous by thread: Opera XML hypertexxt
• Next by thread: Re: Opera XML hypertexxt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread