• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:37:47 -0800 (PST)
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306A0C706@HQ5>
• Reply-to: jim@a...

--- "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]
> >Similarly it costs too much _not_ to move forward when real problems need
> to
> >be solved. In a perfect world world we would all know our requirements,
> have
> >the same requirements, and agree on the solutions to these requirements. 
> 
> We did know.  ISO 8879 and ISO 10744. 

If they meet your requirements, why aren't you using them?

Jim


=====
Jim Ancona
jim@a...                     jancona@x...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

• References:
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread