• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:34:46 -0500
• In-reply-to: <2D399D85685F33449256F526F7BF1EF409C7D0@U...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <2D399D85685F33449256F526F7BF1EF409C7D0@U...>

On Monday 12 November 2001 05:06 pm, Linda Grimaldi wrote:
> One useful aspect to those of us in the db world of the standardization
> of xml:id is a consistent way to ensure uniqueness within a database.
> It's not essential, but it sure would make life easier.

Nobody is precluding specifying constraints such as this in a schema. You 
don't need to standardize to accomplish the goal here.

• Prev by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by Date: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX Parsing of an XML file
• Next by thread: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread