Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
We only finished the spec last month! Can you give us (and the other software vendors) at least some time to support it? Actually, this thread is also helping to tell people that the specification exists, so hopefully more people will think about using it. And yes, the first supporters are likely to be SGML people who see the need, but I believe that others will also see the need eventually and be glad a specification is there. cheers, Lauren Betty L. Harvey wrote: > Sorry, I meant XML and namespaces. Although XML and catalogs > work, I am not familiar with any software (except software > vendors who started in SGML) that support XML catalogs. Public > identifiers and XML seem to be forgotten by XML software > vendors. > > Betty > > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ > Betty Harvey, XML Consultant, | Phone: 410-787-9200 FAX: 9830 > Electronic Commerce Connection, Inc. | > harvey@e... | Washington,DC SGML/XML Users Grp > URL: http://www.eccnet.com | http://www.eccnet.com/xmlug/ > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/ > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Rob Lugt wrote: > > >>Betty L. Harvey wrote >> >> >>>I believe something like TR 9401 is needed for XML. >>> >>> >>That's precisely what the OASIS XML Catalogs specification [1] is for. >> >>~Rob >> >>[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/ >>
|
