[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
  • To: "'james.anderson@s...'" <james.anderson@s...>
  • Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 13:49:09 -0700


> one problem with "expanded name" is that it leads to a term like
> "expanded qualified name", which only makes matters worse.

In otherwords, a namespace-qualified universal expanded namespace name? With
jimmies?

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member