[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:57:37 -0700

Rick Jelliffe wrote on Thursday, September 20, 2001 

> I hacked together an XML Fragment Interchange server last year,
> and put on a "bubble down" and "bubble-up"  option on it: the former
> put all namespace declarations at the top, the second kept them local.

Looking at this a policy question, I could agree that this is a
case where people will disagree, and hence where flexible
designs are appropriate.  Though clearly the folk who don't
like flexibility will object!

If there are only two policies to support, I like these two; as
well as the easy-to-understand metaphor.

But aren't there issues like "how far do you bubble down"?
Normally I'll think that certain nodes in a given document will
be natural spots to bubble down to, even if some decls could
get bubbled down even further.

- Dave



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member