• From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:36:25 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:06 AM
> To: Dave Winer; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE: Sun and independent developers
>
>
> Is the issue to do with the fact that the work on XML-RPC isn't
> being recognised (e.g. as a possible source of implementation
> experience), or that this JCR may sideline that work by putting
> a rubber stamp on SOAP/XP?

If I recall Dave's point when this issue originally arose, it is the fact
that Sun is hijacking the name XML RPC from XML-RPC. While the term is
somewhat generic, Sun could easily fix it by adding the word "for" inbetween
XML and RPC and end the confusion this will cause.

Dave

• References:
  • RE: Sun and independent developers
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Sun and independent developers
• Next by Date: Re: Sun and independent developers
• Previous by thread: RE: Sun and independent developers
• Next by thread: Re: Sun and independent developers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread