• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:24:29 -0400

At 11:13 PM -0700 9/23/01, David Brownell wrote:

>I think what you meant to say about DOM L2 is
>that it doesn't support attribute typing information.
>It certainly includes notations and entities, but not
>in a way that the functionality could've been useful.
>

Yes, that's true, You can find the notations and entities declared in a document. However, there's no way to figure out which elements and attributes in the document they're associated with. 
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml and combo
• Next by Date: FYI: JavaScript and ECMAScript Media Types
• Previous by thread: Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
• Next by thread: Thinking About Data (was RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-wor d)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread