• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:53:50 -0400 (EDT)

Bjoern Hoehrmann scripsit:

> There are actually a lot of documents that repeat what XML 1.0 says,
> even W3C Technical Reports, so this is a rather serious issue.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2001AprJun/0230.html
> is now about 4 months old and there is still nothing in the errata. Why?

Because we are an overworked bunch of volunteers with about five projects
on our plate, and basically an hour a week to focus on problems.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• References:
  • Re: Higher-level protocol encoding info
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Higher-level protocol encoding info
• Next by Date: which is good java development mailing list?
• Previous by thread: Re: Higher-level protocol encoding info
• Next by thread: which is good java development mailing list?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread