• From: James Strachan <james_strachan@y...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>, Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>,Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@k...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 19:21:39 +0100

From: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>
> > Also 'empty' transformers can be used so using JAXP its easy to stream
SAX
> > <-> text <-> DOM <-> dom4j <-> JDOM. i.e. JAXP can now be used to go
from
> > any XML representation to any other with or without a transformation in
> > between.
>
> How's that done if I want to use a SAX event stream as my intermediate
> format, rather than constantly transforming to text and back?

My understanding is most implementations use a SAX event stream as the
intermediate format - not the text format of the XML.
Any that don't should ;-)

James



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xercesand crimson)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xerces andcrimson)
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xercesand crimson)
    • From: James Strachan <james_strachan@y...>
  • Re: JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xercesand crimson)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: (fyi) IBM XML CD
• Next by Date: RE: XML and Perl
• Previous by thread: Re: JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xercesand crimson)
• Next by thread: Re: JAXP and Java XML APIs (was RE: difference bet. xercesand crimson)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread