[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 10 Sep 2001 12:53:39 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > W. E. Perry wrote: > > > The salient point is that there is no *property* right at issue here. The > > individual rights are a usufruct. > > I think you mean that there is no allodial ownership right here; > usufructs are generally understood to be property rights. Just remember that property is theft, and that commons provide(d) an interesting alternative to property as currently "understood"...
|

Cart



