[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:41:35 -0400

On 10 Sep 2001 12:53:39 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> W. E. Perry wrote:
> 
> > The salient point is that there is no *property* right at issue here. The
> > individual rights are a usufruct.
> 
> I think you mean that there is no allodial ownership right here;
> usufructs are generally understood to be property rights.

Just remember that property is theft, and that commons provide(d) an
interesting alternative to property as currently "understood"...



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member